Skip to main content
Home2012 Articles2011 Articles2010 Articles2009 Articles2008 Articles2007 Articles
 
 2010 Articles 
Sunday, March 14 2010

The South is rising again.  Before I go any further, let me clarify.  Sadly, too many in our country possess the superficial and ignorant perception that the only impetus behind southern secession was to perpetuate the abhorrent practice of slavery.  Therefore, when they hear such a phrase, their kneejerk reaction tells them this must be about race.  I assure you, it's not.

 

When the North invaded the South during the 1860s, it was to deny the southern states the ultimate expression of their sovereignty - the ability to withdraw from a union they had voluntarily joined.  Interestingly, secession was a right that the northern New England states had contemplated using themselves in the 1804 Hartford Convention when they felt the national government had become too oppressive.

 

Nevertheless, Lincoln's views on government were clearly expressed in his famous "House Divided" speech when he articulated to the south that he would not allow different states to take different sides on different issues.  We would, "become all one thing, or all the other."  With all due respect to Mr. Lincoln, this was a radical departure from the Founders' view of federalism and good government.  And as a consequence, things got really ugly.

 

So what does any of this have to do with our current situation?  As it turns out, more than you might think.  For instance, in light of our current situation, consider the following words:

 

"Who, then, Mr. President, are the true friends of the Union? Those who would confine the federal government strictly within the limits prescribed by the constitution; who would preserve to the states and the people all powers not expressly delegated; who would make this a federal and not a national Union...And who are its enemies? Those who are in favor of consolidation; who are constantly stealing power from the states, and adding strength to the federal government; who, assuming an unwarrantable jurisdiction over the states and the people, undertake to regulate the whole industry and capital of the country."

 

Sounds like something you just heard on C-SPAN from Mike Pence, Jim DeMint, or Michael Steele, doesn't it?

 

In actuality, those were the words of the famous South Carolina Senator Robert Hayne in his epic debate with Senator Daniel Webster in 1830.  To those who say that history doesn't repeat itself, all evidence to the contrary.  For as Americans have lined up and taken sides in the current dispute over the nationalizing of healthcare (the equivalent of 1/6 of the country's economy), it's important for us to note that this is but another chapter in the longest standing argument in American history.

 

The debate itself began in the oppressively hot Philadelphia summer of 1787 when anti-federalists and federalists locked themselves in a bitter exchange over the appropriate balance of power between the states and the national government. 

 

It continued in the mid 1800s with the nullification crisis and Civil War.  FDR extended it in the 1930s by his radical revolution of nationalizing virtually every industry he could get his hands on, followed by LBJ doubling down on those efforts some forty years later with his Great Society.  And now in 2010, their heir apparent - Barack Obama - is administering the largest federal government power grab in the nation's history.

 

There is one frightening reality about this list.  Each of those examples saw the eventual defeat of states' rights and individual liberty.  Patrick Henry, Robert Hayne, John C. Calhoun, the Constitutionalists who opposed the New Deal, Barry Goldwater.despite powerful appeals, they were eventually unsuccessful in convincing the country to halt the massive intrusion of expansive national government.

 

Will the current Tea Party patriots and other liberty loving individuals eventually meet the same fate?  Perhaps.  But thankfully, Barack Obama and his cohorts are meeting a wall of opposition not seen in well over a century.  To this point, 37 states have taken up legislation to essentially resurrect the nullification doctrine and void the enforcement of the blatantly unconstitutional individual mandate should ObamaCare pass.

 

It's been a long time since three-fourths of the states in this country have been on the same page regarding anything, much less such a critical issue.

 

Yes, the spirit of the South is rising again, but this time it's different.  This time it's all over the country.

Posted by: Peter Heck AT 06:26 pm   |  Permalink   |  19 Comments  |  Email
Comments:
If the South were to rise again, its victory would be bittersweet. Whatever the pleasures of the food, hospitality, and pace of life, if it had won the war, it'd remain a third-world country, with an combo of rich, high-crime cities and impoverished countryside...like Brazil. And for all their talk of the love of liberty, these poor southern states are the biggest recipients of federal largess, whether through the TVA or welfare today. Keep in mind that Dixiecrats dominated the region until the the 1960s, when the Dems supported the Civil Rights Act. They liked big government as much as Obama and his cronies do today. The North has its moral failings, but Dixie has long been on the wrong side of the essence of American prosperity.
Posted by Lauren Bertrand on 03/15/2010 15:09:11
Yaaaaaaaawwwwwn, Peter. Same rant, different day. Find some new material.
Posted by Kevin on 03/15/2010 22:00:01
And THAT, friends, is what we call a solid refutation of evidence given and facts stated. Come on, Kevin...do better.
Posted by peterheck on 03/16/2010 14:50:13
What evidence? What facts? Peter, you couldn't tell the difference between a fact and an opinion if slapped you straight upside the head. This entire column was your OPINION. BTW, Nobody has proposed "nationalizing" healthcare. If you truly believe such a farce you are grossly misinformed. Try getting your facts from reliable sources like the Economist rather than biased rags like the National Review. Then, we can have a discussion about facts and evidence vs. presumptions and opinions. Until then, I won't be wasting any of my time reading your rubbish.
Posted by Kevin on 03/16/2010 21:06:00
37 states have taken up legislation. They haven't passed it. So what, some conservative drafted up a bill that will not get passed. How does that stand up as a national movement? But, you distort that figure to make it appear that "3/4s of states are on the same page." Nope.
Posted by Alexander on 03/17/2010 02:47:50
Actually, Alexander, I did some looking and Virginia has already passed state sovereignty legislation, and well over 20 others have majorities in their legislatures that almost assures its passage. Further, I could be wrong, but I would guess that one of Peter's primary motivations in writing this was to encourage folks to elect state lawmakers who have the backbone to enact this necessary correction. So I'm not sure what the basis of your distortion claim was, but...
Posted by Jon Jon on 03/17/2010 13:36:36
Kevin, the fact that you are commenting on Peter's piece kinda disputes your, "I won't be wasting any of my time reading your rubbish" line, doesn't it? I think you've pretty effectively revealed yourself as a guy who doesn't like Peter's opinions. Fair enough. So why all the bitterness and hate? Can't you be tolerant? Incidentally, are you serious that "nobody has proposed nationalizing" healthcare? Oh my. Bitter and delusional.
Posted by Jack Rileway on 03/17/2010 13:40:00
Kevin: "Nobody has proposed nationalizing healthcare." Barack Obama to the AFL-CIO, 2003: "I happen to be a proponent of single-payer, universal health care coverage." So Kevy, who is it that is "grossly misinformed?"
Posted by Jack's Friend on 03/17/2010 13:46:20
Where in the health care bill does it say hospitals become government agencies? Where does it say doctors and nurses would become public employees? Universal health care is NOT the same as nationalized health care. To claim otherwise is to be grossly misinfomed. But, I guess we shouldn't be expect much different from a group of jokers who spend their time hiding under the blankets from those rotten Commies they think are under the bed.
Posted by Kevin on 03/17/2010 19:08:04
Pardon us, Kevin, for getting government bureaucrats dictating procedures, operations, treatments, and prescription coverage to people with the nationalizing of healthcare. Let me type slowly for your left-wing mind to wrap around this one, okay slick? If the government controls the flow of money to hospitals, doctors, nurses, drug companies, specialists, etc...which they WOULD under single-payer...that is the government nationalizing the industry. You're trying to play semantical games because you got nailed.
Posted by Jack's Friend on 03/17/2010 20:59:10
Does anyone notice the irony of Kevin getting mad at Heck for opinion-hurling and factless "rants," all the while he is throwing out jewels of rational debate like how conservatives hide under their beds afraid of commies? Maybe you should try getting your info from places other than Daily Kos, eh Kevin?
Posted by GD on 03/17/2010 21:01:27
Who "got nailed", Jack's Friend? Just because you responded with a 7 year-old quote that has nothing to do with the current debate does not prove anything. Your point is utterly irrelevant. NOBODY IS PROPOSING A SINGLE PAYER SYSTEM; NOBODY IS PROPOSING "NATIONALIZING" THE HEALTHCARE INDUSTRY. We are talking about reforms to inefficient private health care markets. It's not semantics.
Posted by Kevin on 03/18/2010 10:49:48
Your presumption offensive, GD. I really have no patience for Daily Kos either. I am politically independent and self-employed. I do support health insurance reform because it is incredibly expensive to remain insured for someone like me who is not in a large group. I'm just sick and tired of hearing people like all of you distort this health care debate. Nobody is coming to kill Grandma, this is not some resurrected Soviet plot, and for heaven's sake... nobody is talking about a nationalized, single payer system! Get your facts straight before opening your mouths.
Posted by Kevin on 03/18/2010 10:51:19
If you are self-employed and you are in favor of THIS current health insurance reform, you are like a roach for RAID. It will not lower your premiums, but raise them. It will not increase competition, but destroy it. It will not improve efficiency, but stifle it. It will not improve quality, and will shackle you with a one-size fits all model that will bankrupt the country. Further, if you are honestly so short-sighted you do not see the obviously path this puts us on to single-payer you are disingenuous at best, terribly deluded most likely, or stunningly ignorant at worst.
Posted by GD on 03/18/2010 19:45:49
Good to know your opinions are formed by speculation and fear, rather than fact, GD.
Posted by Kevin on 03/18/2010 20:33:05
And you have cited what facts in refutation of what GD "speculated," Kevin? Here's a fact for you: look at EVERYWHERE ELSE this type of system has been attempted. Shoot, look at RomneyCare in Massachusetts. YOU are the one living in speculation land, in the land of "hope and change," in the land of socialistic utopia. The rest of us live in the real world where government bungles everything it touches. Open your eyes...there are your facts.
Posted by Tohnan the Barbarian on 03/19/2010 09:10:13
Hey Alexander, back to your "distortion claim" : Virginia, Utah, and Idaho have all passed laws to nullify ObamaCare. Arizona has it on the ballot. 20 other states have votes pending in their legislatures. Hmmm, care to revisit your uninformed "you distort that figure to make it appear that 3/4s of states are on the same page" comment?
Posted by Jon Jon on 03/19/2010 09:18:25
They were right in 1776. The South was right in 1861. Conservatives are right in 2010. The age of consolodation is coming to an end, one way or another.
Posted by Steve on 03/19/2010 16:10:53
In contrast to his do-nothing stance with Detroit city corruption, A.G. Cox is joining the legal effort to overturn Obamacare. However, a ballot initiative is the only hope of Michigan joining the states' rights bandwagon. Since Gov. Granholm and cooperative legislators have long served as prototype for the economic havoc that Washington is now wreaking, they're onboard for Obamacare all the way.
Posted by Gary L. Thompson on 03/23/2010 12:15:11

Post comment
Name
 *
Email Address

Message
(max 750 characters)
*
* Required Fields
Note: All comments are subject to approval. Your comment will not appear until it has been approved.

    common sense makes a comeback
    site designed by Keith Parker   --  sign up for Peter Heck Mailing List here